Newsroom

Stay ahead with updates on our latest tools and services, and the ideas shaping 3D & AR for e-commerce.

3D for e-commerce5 min read

Augmented reality e-commerce statistics, with a primary source for every number

A short statistics page. Every figure links to the organisation that published it, with the date and the method, and nothing is taken from vendor roundups.

By CharpstAR · 4 Oct 2023 · Updated 22 Sept 2026

Part of Augmented reality for furniture retail: the complete guide

OCT2023
Augmented reality e-commerce statistics, with a primary source for every number

Most AR statistics pages are copies of each other. A number gets published once, gets quoted without its date, gets re-quoted with the date dropped and the figure rounded up, and five years later it is in every deck with no traceable origin. This page is the opposite exercise. Every figure below comes from a source we opened and read. Where the source is a vendor or a platform reporting on itself, we say so, because that changes how much weight the number carries.

If a statistic you expected is missing, it is because we could not find a primary source for it.

Returns

FigureWhat it coversSource and date
743 billion dollarsTotal value of US retail returnsNRF and Appriss Retail, 2023
14.5 percentReturns as a share of total US retail salesNRF and Appriss Retail, 2023
17.6 percentOnline return rate, worth 247 billion dollarsNRF and Appriss Retail, 2023
10.02 percentBrick and mortar return rate, worth 371 billion dollarsNRF and Appriss Retail, 2023

A methodology note that most citations omit: the NRF's 2023 report draws on returns data from 60 of the top 100 US retailers, and the NRF states that a methodology change means the 2023 figures cannot be compared directly with its 2022 report. Anyone showing you a year-over-year trend line built from those two reports is showing you an artefact.

Cart abandonment

FigureWhat it coversSource
70.22 percentAverage documented online shopping cart abandonment rateBaymard Institute, meta-analysis of 50 studies

Baymard is the strongest source in this article because it aggregates 50 separate studies rather than reporting one company's data. Its breakdown of stated reasons for abandonment is worth reading in full; the largest single cause, setting aside browsing with no intent to buy, is extra costs at checkout at 40 percent.

Conversion and merchant results

These all come from Shopify reporting on merchants using its own 3D and AR features. They are real results from named companies, and they are also a platform publishing numbers that make its product look good. Both things are true.

FigureWhat it coversSource and date
94 percentHigher conversion for products with 3D or AR content than comparable products withoutShopify, September 2020
65 percentRebecca Minkoff shoppers viewing a product in AR more likely to purchaseShopify
44 percentRebecca Minkoff shoppers interacting with a 3D model more likely to add to cartShopify
27 percentRebecca Minkoff shoppers more likely to place an order after 3D interactionShopify
5 percentGunner Kennels reduction in return rate after adding ARShopify

The crucial caveat on all five: these compare shoppers who used the feature against shoppers who did not, on sites that chose to add it. That is not a controlled test, and the true effect is smaller than the headline.

Shopper behaviour

From Shopify's AR article, which attributes each of these to a named research firm.

FigureWhat it coversAttributed to
58 percentCustomers who use AR before making a purchaseClutch, 2026
61 percentAR users accessing it on a mobile deviceClutch
52 percentShoppers who prefer in-person shopping because they want to experience products firsthandChatmeter, 2025
54 percentGlasses shoppers uncertain about buying online who wanted to check frame fitFittingbox, 2025
29 percentGlasses shoppers who have used virtual try-on at least onceFittingbox, 2025

Survey figures about AR usage are the softest category on this page. "Have you used AR before a purchase" is a question many respondents answer inconsistently, because a Snapchat filter and a furniture placement tool both count.

Cost

FigureWhat it coversSource
30,000 to 50,000 dollarsCustom AR app with basic functionalityShopify
Up to 300,000 dollarsComplex custom AR appShopify
From about 39 dollars per monthPrebuilt AR appsShopify

For comparison, our own pricing runs from 10 dollars per product per month on Basic, twelve-month term with a minimum of 100 variants, and from 20 dollars per model per month on Value with a twenty-four month term.

Platform facts, which need no survey

These are not statistics, they are documented platform behaviour, and they are more decisive than most of the numbers above.

  • Android AR from a web link works on ARCore devices running Android 7.0 or later, through Google's Scene Viewer, with no app install.
  • iPhone and iPad AR from Safari works on iOS 12 and later through AR Quick Look, using USDZ files.
  • Google recommends models under 10 MB and below 100,000 triangles for Scene Viewer, with 30,000 to 50,000 ideal.

What we deliberately left out

Global AR market size forecasts, "percentage of retailers planning to adopt AR by 2027" numbers, and any statistic whose only traceable origin is another blog post. If you see a number in this field with no date and no named research organisation, assume it started life as an estimate in a slide deck.

The most useful statistic for your business is one you generate yourself. We build the first 3D model for free so you can put it on a page and get that number. Send us a product, or read about what we build.

Sources

Try it with your product

Send us one product and we build it as a web-ready 3D model with AR, free, for your own product page.

Get your free sample
Ready Phone

Ready When You Are!

Let's build something that moves.

Whether you're exploring 3D for the first time or ready to scale WebAR across your entire catalog, we're here to help you turn products into immersive experiences that convert.

Fill in the contact form and we'll take it from there.